Something which I often recommend to my juniors in the art is the act of visualization. I find that many may think of this as supplementary or perhaps unimportant, but I could not disagree more. When I have been busy, or otherwise unable to train, I found that visualization was not only vital to maintaining my mindset, but also in sharpening my abilities. The ability to picture your techniques, see yourself perform them against an opponent, and then compensate for your mistakes, repeat the experience until you 'get' the correction you want, is vital to the dedicated artist.
Some of this was inspired, actually, from a few manage that I used to read. I know this is a unique and perhaps silly source from which to draw inspiration, but perhaps that is the point of inspiration.
There are several levels to training that we undergo, and hopefully we continue to grow in that respect. But we must also focus on the mental training that is available to us as experienced martial artists.
I must also say that visualization often coincides with breath training - I find myself unable to separate the correct breathing in visualization without doing so in real life. Perhaps this is a weakness in myself, perhaps this is a benefit of visualization. With the right breathing, power is magnified (just as in the manga - albeit to ludicrous levels). But in reading old texts and sayings from Okinawa and China, their belief in the breath was very strong, so perhaps this isn't an incorrect focus for study.
I have also found that visualization has another aspect of training can help to clear the mind (much like meditation) and hence improve reactions and reflexes. I think that watching videos is of similar benefit when you are trying to emulate a technique - seeing someone you find worth emulating perform the most subtle aspects of the technique not only give you insight into your own technique, but serve as motivation for future physical training.
As always, the way is in training.
22 May, 2016
Working with juniors and seniors
I haven't posted in a long time, mostly because I have found much of my time revolving around reading those of my betters.
In that vein, I must recommend the works of Gary Lever and Joe Swift. Great authors with strong training and with interesting viewpoints. Reading perhaps more for karateka than others, but perhaps worthy of at least a look by others in the budo/bugei.
Anyways, back to the point. Recently in class we have just finished a round of gradings and so myself and the next most senior (we are second and third highest under our sensei) are able to spend time working with/against each other. After working with each other on knife defences and kakie drills, it brought home how much higher I am than those I usually work with. I did things that I wouldn't have been able to with lower ranks - they wouldn't have survived. I don't say this as a boast, but rather that it shocked me. I had to readjust my own abilities, and it felt good to open up a bit and do something that would be downright dangerous with anyone else.
On reflection, it makes me think of the cycle of senior helping junior, who eventually becomes the senior. A fascinating microcosm of the universe, with shorter (or maybe longer) generations than that found in the family. And it brings home what the dojo really is - a family that trains.
The way is in the training.
In that vein, I must recommend the works of Gary Lever and Joe Swift. Great authors with strong training and with interesting viewpoints. Reading perhaps more for karateka than others, but perhaps worthy of at least a look by others in the budo/bugei.
Anyways, back to the point. Recently in class we have just finished a round of gradings and so myself and the next most senior (we are second and third highest under our sensei) are able to spend time working with/against each other. After working with each other on knife defences and kakie drills, it brought home how much higher I am than those I usually work with. I did things that I wouldn't have been able to with lower ranks - they wouldn't have survived. I don't say this as a boast, but rather that it shocked me. I had to readjust my own abilities, and it felt good to open up a bit and do something that would be downright dangerous with anyone else.
On reflection, it makes me think of the cycle of senior helping junior, who eventually becomes the senior. A fascinating microcosm of the universe, with shorter (or maybe longer) generations than that found in the family. And it brings home what the dojo really is - a family that trains.
The way is in the training.
10 August, 2014
More good advice
This really transcends arts and is great advice in general from a great author and karateka, Mike Clarke:
One particular item that struck me is "Be hard on yourself and easy on others." As I find myself too quick to judge, this is advice that strikes deep.
Martial arts are about facing yourself, finding out what you don't like about yourself, and striving to change it.
As always, the way is in the training...
Martial arts are about facing yourself, finding out what you don't like about yourself, and striving to change it.
As always, the way is in the training...
20 July, 2014
Effective Practice and Question to others
Just a great post which I think any martial artist would find helpful. It is all about teaching and training in a consistent manner to achieve the results you want:
I have mentioned this before, but Ryan Parker's blog is one of the best resources for understanding close combat methods of Okinawa, and it seems this is often related to a lot of Asian martial arts.
I hope to be posting more in the future, as I have been doing a lot of reading, thinking, watching and training.
As an aside, does anyone have similar symptoms to the following:
I feel like I have too much energy. It almost feels pent up, not frustrating but like I need to spend quality time with my missus, if get my drift. I am almost shaking. Training does not seem to be an outlet. I don't believe in chi, but if I did I would say that something is overloading me from that perspective. If anyone has any ideas what this feeling is, comes from, or how to deal with it, I would appreciate it. It is hard to type this, as I am all but shaking. I have only had this feeling a few times in the past.
As always, the way is in the training!
11 April, 2014
More karate or martial art phrases
Here are a few more phrases that may be of interest. I find a great deal of knowledge in the simplicity of short phrases of wisdom. The brevity adds a measure of abstraction that requires more thought and diving deep into ones experience.
I wish I could lay claim to collecting these, but again others have done the hard work.
The way is in training...
Collection of the karate proverbs written in the Yojijukugo 四字熟語 (four characters) style:1. On Ko Chi Shin 温古知新 - ask old to understand a new2. Hatsuun Jindō 抜雲尋道 - parting the clouds and find the way3. Bun Bu Ryō Dō 文武両道 - literary and martial arts as one4. Kō Un Ryū Sui 行雲流水 - floating clouds, flowing water5. Kisshu Fushin 鬼手佛心 - a demon's hand, a saint's heart6. Seki Ma No Sei 石磨之勢 - the incentive to polish stones 7. Nai Gō Gai Jū 内剛外柔 - hard on the inside and gently outside
I wish I could lay claim to collecting these, but again others have done the hard work.
The way is in training...
What is important in your art
Again I must link to my betters:
The idea here is that we practice martial arts, not martial sports or martial techniques. Without a sense of beauty, elegance and efficiency then why do we not just focus on brute force and outright death?
Fantastic thoughts abound with this concept.
The way is in training, as always...
The idea here is that we practice martial arts, not martial sports or martial techniques. Without a sense of beauty, elegance and efficiency then why do we not just focus on brute force and outright death?
Fantastic thoughts abound with this concept.
The way is in training, as always...
01 March, 2014
Inspirational Phrases
It has been a long time since I posted anything. I just haven't felt the urge, nor do I think that anything I have to say will add to that already out there, or better yet that discovered through training. If you seek wiser words, please do visit some of the blogs I have mentioned in past articles.
Anyways, here are some interesting phrases and sayings that are relate to karate or martial arts in general. I found this list on the Shinsokai website. I hope that people will visit the original to see the full information, but I think just seeing the phrases and trying to understand it from your own context is also informative.
Here are some of the ones I find the most interesting, applicable and immediate relevant to my own attitudes and training.
- Bunbu ryudo
- The twofold path of martial and literary arts
- Onko chisin
- Study the old to understand the new
- Shin gi tai
- Character, technique, body
As always, friends, the way is in the training.
24 November, 2013
Ryukyu Martial Arts and other great blogs
For the few that follow my blog, I would like to point out an excellent resource that (if I haven't pointed out yet in a previous blog) I would like everyone to visit and examine.
Ryan Parker Shinshii (Sensei in Okinawan) is a great wealth of information, from conditioning to application of techniques to research and development of bunkai. The world could do worse to have more like him. I would greatly recommend following his blog, or looking him up on youtube - he is a rare person who shares his knowledge freely and has a keen mind that cuts through the BS too often associated with the martial arts.
While I am at it, I would like to point out some of my favourite blogs. Please excuse any repeats from previous posts. These are ones which I visit and revisit regularly and find something new or important every time. The world definitely needs more people like this.
As always, yours in training (where you will find the way)...
Kempo Hakku and Chinese Influences
I have been thinking again about the Kempo Hakku found in the Bubishi. For those who do not know about this document, it is the so-called Bible of Karate. It contains references to pressure points, philosphy, ethics, forms and useful self defense techniques that can be found in (some of the) kata of differing karate traditions.
I have decided to write a brief post about these 8 Lwas of the Fist Way, and compare some thoughts I have found about Chinese Quan Fa. Regardless of the actual connection between Karate and Quan Fa, I think this comparison might be interesting and at least useful as a recording of my own thoughts.
First, let's give the 8 Laws of the Fist Way, then some principles that some may be familiar with.
1. Jinshin wa tenchi ni onaji. -The mind is one with heaven and earth.
2. Ketsumyaku wa nichigetsu ni nitari. -The circulatory rhythm of the body is similar to the cycle of the sun and the moon.
3. Ho wa goju wo tondo su. -The way of inhaling and exhaling is both hard and soft.
4. Mi wa toki ni shitagai hen ni ozu. -Act in accordance with time and change.
5. Te wa ku ni ai sunawachi hairu. -Techniques will occur in the absence of conscious thought.
6. Shintai wa hakarite riho su. -The feet must advance and retreat, separate and meet.
7. Me wa shiho wo miru wa yosu. -The eyes do not miss even the slightest change.
8. Mimi wa yoku happo wo kiku. -The ears listen well in all directions
You can find similar translations all over the place. Perhaps a better translation is found here:
And now, here is an excerpt on the methods and 'secrets' of quan fa from another excellent blog, Be Not Defeated By the Rain:
From another perspective, 「直橫」is a boxing mnemonic, and is one of the most important principles in Southern kung fu, like swallowing and expelling「吞吐」floating and sinking「浮沉」twisting and turning「擰轉」it describes how to use the body. The martial artist form Lingnam Lee Sai Wing states in his work 《工字伏虎拳拳譜》 states:
"The Art of Boxing is easy to learn and hard to attain its essense, one has to first understand its rules and practice its standards, afterwards one has to train the qi and power and be proficient in receiving the enemy's attacks. Understanding this, one's kung fu increases, from this [basis] one seeks the straight and sideways, swallowing and expelling, forward and retreat, entering and exiting, the secret of the four places, the method of the five gates, the shape of the eight faces, the road of life and death"
One can see from this that straight and sideways is an important wushu concept, and to treat it as standing up or lying on the floor is to distort its original meaning. The literati have always liked to play with words but to deliberately distort an important martial concept is to me unnecessary and seem to be intentionally misleading.
from: The Grandmaster
Here is a brief summary of the methods or movements key to Quan Fa:
- Straight and Sideways
- Swallowing and Expelling
- Forward and Retreat
- Entering and Exiting
- Four Places
- Five Gates
- Eight Faces
- Floating and Sinking
- Twisting and Turning
So, I would like to draw attention to the most basic of these, floating/sinking (Heaven and Earth) and spitting/swallowing (I see a clear reference to inhalation and exhalation, aka Goju). It seems clear to me that these four basic methods of dealing with an attack are found in most, if not all, of karate's kata. But we also see examples of certain other aspects in some of the forms as well. Sideways is obvious in Naihanchi, and things such as forward/retreat and enter/exit (either of these two could be linked to Sun and Moon, but more obviously a reference to the feet meeting and retreating from another) as seen all over the place. Twisting and turning are found in kata from all styles of karate (Taikyuko, Heian, Saifa, Kururunfa come to mind off hand). What I can't place is the 4 places and 5 gates. 8 faces seems to hint towards the eight basic directions of attack (N, S, E, W, NE, NW, SE, SW) and also the directions in which the ears should listen. Interesting...
At any rate, it is late, and I have to think more on what all of this means. I hope to cover my thoughts in more detail in later articles.
As always, the way is in training...
Don't Forget to Remain a Student
Just a micro post to highlight a great post over at Shinseidokan blog:
The title of my post is taken directly from the end of this blog post. Mike Clarke Sensei says:
Excellent words to live by! As always when I hear such good and simple advice, I am humbled and glad to be able to study something I love to much.
The title of my post is taken directly from the end of this blog post. Mike Clarke Sensei says:
In the rush to be a karate teacher, don't forget to remain a karate student.
Excellent words to live by! As always when I hear such good and simple advice, I am humbled and glad to be able to study something I love to much.
13 October, 2013
Importance of Weapon Training
This post comes from a variety of thoughts circulating in my head recently. It has come as the result of recent discussions with those wiser than me in karate. And that topic is of the importance of weapons training.
Now let me preface all of the proceeding writing with information about my current state. I have been doing karate, in some form, for the last 15+ years, more than 10 of which have been in my current style of Goju Ryu. In those 15 years, I have studied at least 4 years of Iaido and at least 10 years of Saijutsu (as a component of karate). I have also have the opportunity to play with tai chi sword, butterfly sword, nito (Musashi's two sworded style), eskrima sticks, butterfly knives and bokuto/bokken. I have use briefly also a bo. So I am not a stranger to weapons training, but definitely not well experienced in anything but sai and iaito, which I would claim some measure of capability.
But specifically I have been really thinking hard about learning traditional Okinawan Kobudo. Not only would this reinforce my interest in Okinawan Karate, it would directly benefit it. It can be seen as a form of strength training at the least, but this would be a poor reason to study it. It is an entire history of the islands I have come to respect with lessons that reinforce what I know and would let me learn that which I have yet to imagine or comprehend.
Recently (I mean for the last 50-100 years) karate has been taught separately from kobudo, despite there being a solid history of their combined methods being taught together. In fact, many of the greatest names in karate have kobudo kata named after them. This alone should give any karateka pause to consider studying kobudo.
But beyond this, I don't want to learn just any weapons. I want to learn the most esoteric. I have recently seen some great applications of weapons forms. Here is an example of applied nunchaku or surujin technique:
I have also come to the realization that much of the island's bo techniques are based around not just the staff (what in Chinese Quan Fa is called the Grandfather of weapons) but also the oar (eku) and spear (yari). So much of what I want to learn is the technique and application of armed combat from the masters of armed and unarmed combat from the Ryukyu islands. I see and sense a great depth there which I have yet to tap or understand, and hope to in the future.
Anyways, this leads me to the question: why did the split happen? Why is karate taught alone, and kobudo the same? I ask this because I ask myself what I would want to teach. My answer is always a complete art: one with strikes, locks, throws, weapons (improvised or otherwise), escapes, restraints and healing technology. When I look at the curriculum of a other martial arts, I see the inclusion of at least a few weapons forms/techniques/styles. Why should I or my students (should I ever have any) be any less demanding of our art? When I look to the past, this is what my lineage should hold: all of the above. The history of karate is deeper than the common place "peasant/famer's art" that is considered standard history: it is one of police and palace guards. It is one of such depth that I hope to one day see enough to consider myself a true student rather than someone lost in the deep end of a swimming pool.
The way is in the training, as always...
Fighting taller and stronger
This is an old post I meant to post months back, but I am finally posting it as something to think about.
I had a dream. The details are somewhat fuzzy, but I think I was bicycling past some guy, who hits me in the back of the head as a I go past. My male ego flares up, and I stop and ask WTH that was about. He responds that he thought I was a boxer based on my reaction. I proceed to try to hit him in the face, unsuccessfully. I woke up, realizing how stupid this situation and my reaction are/were, and calming down to realize this was a dream and not real.
My reaction to all of this was multi-fold. First, I need to ensure I always check that ego at the door - it serves no purpose but to escalate primate behaviour with no good plausible outcome. Second, I need to examine my own technique and be aware of using my own height and weight as an advantage - technique should trump physical characteristics and should work without those advantages. Third, what the heck am I going to do against someone who has reach on me?
The first point I think is self explanatory - I strive to be a humble person, but there is always an element of pride in one's skills as a martial artist. Be humble! Don't rise to the bait. Best to be more aware, more careful, and avoid going past some smartass. And if it happens, get away! The goal isn't to dominate or prove who is the alpha male - it is to get home and protect those I love!
The second requires some clarification. I am one of the most senior karateka in my dojo. Also, at 5'11" and 205 lbs one of the heaviest. It is easy to become complacent with one's skill and (without ego) superiority over others when you have all the advantages (experience training, reach, mass, strength (theoretically)). I need to strive to avoid that - break down what I do and how I do it so that it will work for even the lightest, smallest person.
The third now also becomes obvious. If I rely on mass and technique, I just need to find someone with comparative experience and greater height to end up on the losing end of an exchange. I need to work my techniques and polish up my bag of tricks to deal with those situations. Case in point, there are probably 4 people in the dojo with greater reach or strength or mass that I would be hard pressed against. Am I preparing against an opponent like them? That is the test of my skill I should strive to best.
27 September, 2013
The Spread of Misinformation
I have recently become increasingly aware of both my own naivete the spread of (mis)information on the internet as a whole. Without cited sources (which I try to do, but often fail at) one should treat such information with at least a dash of skepticism.
I modified an old post, found here:
to reflect one such change.
I apologize for any further misinformation spread on my part. I encourage others to increase their vigilance when dealing with popular legends, myths and theoretical connections that we wish to make.
Also, my apologies specifically to the author and teacher at Tsubokai, Alan Wolfenden. It is never my intent to post misinformation, so I encourage those who find something incorrect in my blog to point it out to me.
18 August, 2013
Quotes, Research, History, Training
Just a quick post to link to another great blogger, author and martial artist. His posts are often insightful and I would like to just highlight one of the latest. I am found of quotes, and this post has a great one.
The quote here is:
You can never cross the ocean until you have the courage to lose sight of the shore.
Very true. What are you willing to lose sight of in order to attain that goal? And you must at some point leave the shore to venture out and find your promised land.
Another post I wanted to highlight from another wiser than myself, who studies the old school systems that formed modern karate. His training videos, skills, and knowledge speak for themselves.
This post highlights a couple of interesting ideas. The native grappling and arresting techniques inherent in karate (tuidi) are very likely linked historically to Japanese bujutsu. This opens a whole area of interest to me, as well as redefining what the origins of karate are and why it looks nothing like others arts in China and Japan - it is truly a synthesis of many.
13 August, 2013
Where to put what you add
This applies to many arts, as I have been looking at the kata list of many systems in the recent past.
I sometimes wonder why masters of the arts feel the need to create additional forms. Not that I don't understand the desire to add to the art, to add your own lasting impression. But why is it always the lower side of the curriculum - it is always for the most junior students.
Now, I can understand why this would be necessary, at least for the first few generations. After all, assuming that you learn from a battle hardened warrior, he is not necessarily a born teacher, nor does he necessarily have the basics organized in a way that is easiest to learn, or in escalating terms of difficulty. So as a student of such a teacher, you set about organizing what you have learned. Perhaps you take some of the easiest things and organize them towards the start of one of your new student's learning career. And then either you, or one of your students, starting adding forms to help in this. Perhaps, like Anko Itosu, you create forms for children starting to learn your system and arts.
But cut forward to modern day. Why create a new style, or keeping what you were taught, you decide to add to it. But you are not adding something missing from the system - a weapon, or technique, or skill set, or whatever you find isn't included. You add more to the lower end.
Is this done because the students are dumber than in your day? Or perhaps it is just because you start children younger and you need something even a 5 year old can do? If this is all just for children, why bother having adults learn this curriculum - it becomes irrelevant once you have the higher levels. For that matter, why bother having it for any one older than 12 - at that age they can easily begin learning the true art, and 5+ years of training puts then in a good position to prepare for blackbelt.
Or is it because you believe you need to add to the system, but you don't know or believe that you are capable of adding something more comprehensive? Or is it because you haven't learned anything so you don't know what to add? Or is it because you want to believe in your own image as a great and powerful martial artist?
I am not accusing anyone - this is all just a thought exercise on my part. It is relevant as I wonder if I will ever make a contribution to my own art. Something truly non-trivial. Something that adds depth or at least something not yet included natively. I could go and learn Indian stick fighting or Filipino dagger techniques, but would they mesh with what I know and do? The how of getting from point A to point B is interesting as a thought exercise.
Food for thought, as the saying goes.
I sometimes wonder why masters of the arts feel the need to create additional forms. Not that I don't understand the desire to add to the art, to add your own lasting impression. But why is it always the lower side of the curriculum - it is always for the most junior students.
Now, I can understand why this would be necessary, at least for the first few generations. After all, assuming that you learn from a battle hardened warrior, he is not necessarily a born teacher, nor does he necessarily have the basics organized in a way that is easiest to learn, or in escalating terms of difficulty. So as a student of such a teacher, you set about organizing what you have learned. Perhaps you take some of the easiest things and organize them towards the start of one of your new student's learning career. And then either you, or one of your students, starting adding forms to help in this. Perhaps, like Anko Itosu, you create forms for children starting to learn your system and arts.
But cut forward to modern day. Why create a new style, or keeping what you were taught, you decide to add to it. But you are not adding something missing from the system - a weapon, or technique, or skill set, or whatever you find isn't included. You add more to the lower end.
Is this done because the students are dumber than in your day? Or perhaps it is just because you start children younger and you need something even a 5 year old can do? If this is all just for children, why bother having adults learn this curriculum - it becomes irrelevant once you have the higher levels. For that matter, why bother having it for any one older than 12 - at that age they can easily begin learning the true art, and 5+ years of training puts then in a good position to prepare for blackbelt.
Or is it because you believe you need to add to the system, but you don't know or believe that you are capable of adding something more comprehensive? Or is it because you haven't learned anything so you don't know what to add? Or is it because you want to believe in your own image as a great and powerful martial artist?
I am not accusing anyone - this is all just a thought exercise on my part. It is relevant as I wonder if I will ever make a contribution to my own art. Something truly non-trivial. Something that adds depth or at least something not yet included natively. I could go and learn Indian stick fighting or Filipino dagger techniques, but would they mesh with what I know and do? The how of getting from point A to point B is interesting as a thought exercise.
Food for thought, as the saying goes.
21 July, 2013
Why is Suparinpei so great?
This post is long overdue - my apologies for those wondering what happened. To sum up the last few months I have been looking outside the blogging world and making connections, and taking a well earned vacation. I have also taken up some basic hojo undo exercises, which I find rewarding in their benefit as well as their simultaneous difficulty and simplicity. I have also been a little tired of blogging - not all of my thoughts are what I want to share, and they aren't what I want to embody. So why share negativity?
At any rate, I have been working on the below for a little while. Just a few thoughts for those with familiarity with karate or similar systems where solo forms comprise a significant part of practice. It also leads from my last post about the hierarchy of forms within a system.
The question on my mind recently has been: what makes any form the capstone of a system? And as a subset to that question, how many years of practice does it take to understand it? Karate is unique among martial arts in that it contains forms for combat which are largely misunderstood by most if not all. Even those with a solid background in their application do not understand all movements in all forms, and hence we often see masters (who founded their own schools!) puzzling over certain movements their entire lives. Somewhat like a physical koan. With this in mind, I must look to the form I have learned as the highest in our system - Suparinpei.
Now abstractly, a capstone to any system could be the hardest lessons to teach. The techniques require greater skills to apply successfully in a battle, but present a wider range of options and abilities in keeping with the core intent of the art. This is in keeping with Western educational theory, but is unlikely to be applicable to Eastern education methods.
The capstone could also consist of deadlier techniques, those which will unquestionably kill the attacker. The release of such techniques at a lower level would be irresponsible for any teacher without truly knowing a person for several years, possibly decades. This sounds a little too much like reserved special techniques only given to the chosen few. While it is a romantic notion and perhaps could even be the case in certain styles, it isn't as practical nor as likely. If such knowledge does die out, then it can be rediscovered. As the saying goes, there is nothing new under the sun...
The capstone could also, like in some koryu, be those that are the oldest and most central to the system. They contain the intent of the style in the most simple and yet difficult to understand techniques to which you have been building over the course of your studies.
There could be more possibilities - if those reading this have any ideas, I would be glad to read them and increase my own knowledge further.
In regards to Suparinpei, it is said to contain the full syllabus of Goju Ryu. So perhaps one could see it as a recap or condensation of all other forms? If this is the case, then why include the others? IF this is the case, why isn't the form longer, or feature less repetition, so as to include a single defining technique/principle from each of the other forms in the style? This is also problematic when considering the history of the style - if some forms are newer than Suparinpei, or even older from a different style or lineage (eg: not of White Crane connected origin) how can Suparinpei encompass those forms and their lessons? If we accept that it only contains the lessons from Higaonna Kanryo Sensei, does it only encompass Sanchin, Seisan, and Sanseiryu? Moreover, there are records indicating that Suparinpei existed on Okinawa before Higaonna left to study in China. There was also at least a form of Seisan as well before Higaonna left. So where does this leave us?
The above were my thoughts in abstract about suparinpei. But after a lot of reading and training, I am beginning to discover more information and come to realize several things physically about this kata.
First, who am I to question this? I have made the beginner mistake of assuming that because I learned the form that I know it. I see the surface, but I have not really seen more than the surface of the form. With additional reading and study I have come to find an incredible amount of information in the simplest movements. The subtle body mechanics, turning, stepping, where you place your feet and how that hinders your opponent and makes your technique possible or more effective. The repetition in directions, the timing - I forgot the subtle science that is kata. This has caused me to go back and look at other forms as well - especially my favourite behind Suparinpei, Kururunfa. The opening has long bothered me, and the more I watch and learn and play, the more I come to think and understand and try. I understand more fully now why they say you could have all of your training in a single form and be complete.
As always, the way is in the training. Training means physical, mental and somewhat spiritual.
At any rate, I have been working on the below for a little while. Just a few thoughts for those with familiarity with karate or similar systems where solo forms comprise a significant part of practice. It also leads from my last post about the hierarchy of forms within a system.
The question on my mind recently has been: what makes any form the capstone of a system? And as a subset to that question, how many years of practice does it take to understand it? Karate is unique among martial arts in that it contains forms for combat which are largely misunderstood by most if not all. Even those with a solid background in their application do not understand all movements in all forms, and hence we often see masters (who founded their own schools!) puzzling over certain movements their entire lives. Somewhat like a physical koan. With this in mind, I must look to the form I have learned as the highest in our system - Suparinpei.
Now abstractly, a capstone to any system could be the hardest lessons to teach. The techniques require greater skills to apply successfully in a battle, but present a wider range of options and abilities in keeping with the core intent of the art. This is in keeping with Western educational theory, but is unlikely to be applicable to Eastern education methods.
The capstone could also consist of deadlier techniques, those which will unquestionably kill the attacker. The release of such techniques at a lower level would be irresponsible for any teacher without truly knowing a person for several years, possibly decades. This sounds a little too much like reserved special techniques only given to the chosen few. While it is a romantic notion and perhaps could even be the case in certain styles, it isn't as practical nor as likely. If such knowledge does die out, then it can be rediscovered. As the saying goes, there is nothing new under the sun...
The capstone could also, like in some koryu, be those that are the oldest and most central to the system. They contain the intent of the style in the most simple and yet difficult to understand techniques to which you have been building over the course of your studies.
There could be more possibilities - if those reading this have any ideas, I would be glad to read them and increase my own knowledge further.
In regards to Suparinpei, it is said to contain the full syllabus of Goju Ryu. So perhaps one could see it as a recap or condensation of all other forms? If this is the case, then why include the others? IF this is the case, why isn't the form longer, or feature less repetition, so as to include a single defining technique/principle from each of the other forms in the style? This is also problematic when considering the history of the style - if some forms are newer than Suparinpei, or even older from a different style or lineage (eg: not of White Crane connected origin) how can Suparinpei encompass those forms and their lessons? If we accept that it only contains the lessons from Higaonna Kanryo Sensei, does it only encompass Sanchin, Seisan, and Sanseiryu? Moreover, there are records indicating that Suparinpei existed on Okinawa before Higaonna left to study in China. There was also at least a form of Seisan as well before Higaonna left. So where does this leave us?
The above were my thoughts in abstract about suparinpei. But after a lot of reading and training, I am beginning to discover more information and come to realize several things physically about this kata.
First, who am I to question this? I have made the beginner mistake of assuming that because I learned the form that I know it. I see the surface, but I have not really seen more than the surface of the form. With additional reading and study I have come to find an incredible amount of information in the simplest movements. The subtle body mechanics, turning, stepping, where you place your feet and how that hinders your opponent and makes your technique possible or more effective. The repetition in directions, the timing - I forgot the subtle science that is kata. This has caused me to go back and look at other forms as well - especially my favourite behind Suparinpei, Kururunfa. The opening has long bothered me, and the more I watch and learn and play, the more I come to think and understand and try. I understand more fully now why they say you could have all of your training in a single form and be complete.
As always, the way is in the training. Training means physical, mental and somewhat spiritual.
19 May, 2013
Order of Kata: Progression, Individual Needs, or the Way of the Disciple?
I have been thinking a lot about the order and progression of kata, specifically within the Goju system. Recently reading an article at Total Karate brought some of these thoughts to the forefront.
I have seen a lot of theories about the order and progression of kata within a system. Since I honestly don't have much of an opinion of the goju kata and their order (perhaps a case of being too close to see what is in front of me), I have been doing a lot of reading. I don't think that this was often written down in the past by others, as I have found scant resources dealing with this topic specifically, and definitely little to nothing from the older masters. I should note, I am still working through some older material at the moment, so there is still hope.
First, let's start off with some definitions. When I refer to order I refer to the order in which the forms are taught within a system. When I refer to progression this is an admittedly loaded term which is bundled with the assumption that there is an increase in difficulty or skill with later forms versus beginner forms.
Now for some theory. Why have more than one form in a system? Many of the arts are founded on a few principles which are supposedly recorded in a core form, usually the highest in the system. This form is said to contain everything in the school - by practicing this form you can see the basics that have been isolated for training specific skills in other forms or drills. For more on this line of thought, please see another post at Classic Budoka.
Another possibility is that the higher forms are more difficult. Perhaps as a beginner you must learn the most basic techniques that will help you survive. AS you progress, you can refine the technique into more subtle movements. In this progression, the later forms are more minimalistic and obviously more difficult. This has a certain logic to it that draws my mind to it - like learning in school, why start with calculus when you don't understand the basics of arithmetic? But logic nor my own tendencies necessarily dictate reality...
Another possibility is that you learn a form or two to gain the skills you need. Then you realize that something is missing, and in your research find it in another form. So you pick it up to round out your skills and strengthen your own weaknesses. So a form you learn later, and perhaps teach later, does not have any inherent difficulty or skill refinement that is a progression from earlier forms, but rather a new set of skills that are equally important for someone with only the preceding forms as a basis.
Here is a fact for thought: some masters reportedly had a favourite kata. I have had favourites at each belt level, and it has changed as I learned new forms. Shishochin at shodan, seisan at nidan, kururunfa at sandan, and now suparinpei at yondan. Does this reflect a modern ADHD-esque behaviour compared to the stalwart and dogged determination of past practicitioners? Or is there perhaps little difference between forms and it is up to the karateka to determine where they should spend their time?
As a comparison, here are the core forms of Goju as learned in my lineage:
Kyu belts
- Taikyoku kata - gedan, chudan, jodan (additional taikyoku crop up throughout the ranks)
- Gekisai ichi
- Gekisai ni
- Sanchin
- Tensho
- Saifa
- Seiunchin
- Sanseiryu
Yudansha
- Shisochin
- Seisan
- Seipai
- Kururunfa
- Suparinpei
I should note that Seipai and Kururunfa are both learned together at Sandan in preparation for Yondan.
And here is a breakdown from Miyagi Chojun in his article Historical Outline for Karate-Do, Martial Arts of Ryukyu:
- Junbi Undo - preparatory exercises for building strength and flexibility for basics.
- Kihon Kata - basic forms, specifically listing Sanchin, Tensho and Naihanchi.
- Hojo Undo - supplementary exercises to develop muscles, bones, ligaments, fascia to support martial activities and explosive power required.
- Kaishu Kata - all forms except the kihon.
- Kumite - where the application of the kaishu kata is unbound from the kata.
The category of kaishu kata is left pretty open, likely to include Shurite as well as Nahate school forms. At the time of this writing, Miyagi was heavily involved with the Okinawan Karate Study Group and there was a lot of agreement between the masters that the different forms of karate were immaterial, they were all one at heart.
I should also note that there are stories from different students of Miyagi that indicate different kata were taught to different people at different times. So was it a matter of flavour of the month (or year or cycle) or was there a method to the madness? Did some students show predisposition towards certain forms than others? And what are those factors, so that we may today know which forms we could study from to gain the most benefit before moving on?
Finally, here is a list of the forms I have seen listed in other schools. I believe this is a generic listing, but it may well trace to a single student of Miyagi.
Kihon
- Sanchin
Kaishu
- Gekisai ichi and ni
- Saifa
- Seiunchin
- Shisochin
- Sanseiryu
- Seipai
- Kururunfa
- Seisan
- Suparinpei
Heishu
- Tensho
Here is a quick list from the Shuri side of things - the 15 kata of early Shotokan, before they started going nuts with them:
- Pinan 1-5 (Heian)
- Naihanchi 1-3 (Naifanchi, Tekki)
- Kushanku (Kanku)
- Passai (Bassai)
- Seisan (Hangetsu)
- Wanshu (Enpi)
- Chinto (Gankaku)
- Jitte
- Jion
Before completing this article, I broke down and asked my Sensei. His answer was simple. That was the order that it was learned by a sensei further up the lineage, so that was the order it was handed down. While this doesn't invalidate the above, it does put this line of reasoning into perspective. Perhaps it really doesn't matter, and I am making a mountain out of a mole hill. My own studies should continue, despite this information. The way of study is to find your own way?
27 April, 2013
First quarter and training results
Quick update on my personal training which I mentioned in a post back in January: Daily Training.
First, it should be noted that I have largely stopped daily training. There are multiple reasons for this, mostly due to some lingering injuries and a burst of time spent at work. But here is a little summary of the points I noted:
I pulled something in my leg during the end bit of a 9 hour training in the beginning of the year. I am sure this influenced by sanchin practice, as well as discouraged me from continuing. I know the pain isn't real damage, but I had a bad experience with this earlier. About a year and a half ago I had such severe knee pain that I would wake up at night, several times, almost crying. It was starting to even wake my wife, despite trying to hold it in. Only after some good physio, strengthening, stretching and massage was I able to sleep normally. That was a very draining period, and I didn't want to relapse. I have found that stretching carefully as well as other movements from yoga and calisthenics have helped immensely, but I need to remember to keep up this practice!
Recently I have also started to include some irregular Naifanchin practice into my routine. There is something very Sanchin-like about this variation of Naihanchin that speaks to me. The breathing is similar, and I like the emphasis on non-traditional strikes. Too much of karate focuses now on the usual seiken (forefist) technique, where the original forms had much more variety. Indeed, looking at other Southern Chinese arts shows a great variety of hand forms and unique striking possibilities. I want to start changing my own preference from fist to open-handed variants. On that topic, there is a great article from Ryan Parker at his blog.
Of particular interest to any karateka should be the use of ipponken, nukite and washide uchi techniques. Really interesting information by one who has done the research and practiced what he found. I have never had anyone teach me the boshiken technique, and its not in any form I know or was taught, but I find it very useful for massage! I suspect there is a strong link between correct massage (hitting points to release stress and muscle tension) and hitting soft points to weaken enemies - perhaps a correlation between karate and jujutsu here, where bone setters would also be jujutsu masters. Wishful thinking on my part, but it gives me hope for my own studies. Thumb strikes are great to get into little places like collar bone, armpit, knee pit (?) and arteries like carotid and femoral.
Well, this was a longer post than intended, but I hope something of interest has been exposed to others. At least I have set my own mind straight - more gentle leg tension in Sanchin, more playing with Naihanchi, and look into mental exercises for use in Tensho. I need to get back into a daily routine as well, even if it is more gentle. As I mentioned recently, don't let perfect be the enemy of good. Daily something is better than daily nothing!
First, it should be noted that I have largely stopped daily training. There are multiple reasons for this, mostly due to some lingering injuries and a burst of time spent at work. But here is a little summary of the points I noted:
- Sanchin causing knee pain. I need to look further into this - perhaps perform this with less tension in the legs. I have very strong and big legs, and it is possible that I am pulling too hard with the larger muscles than what my weakened ligaments, fascia and smaller muscles can handle. I did find this to be great training though - I could be exhausted after a single form. Truly, I need to read and experiment more.
- Tensho is relaxing, but no great breakthrough. I have not had much in the way of great internal work that I have been hoping for. Perhaps I need a different mental aspect when doing this form, but honestly trying to create this myself without some indication is difficult. I need to learn more about the Chinese systems and see what they utilize.
- Tiet Tsin Kune seems to help shoulders and lower back. Oddly, a lot of the internal stuff also tends to really aggravate my neck and shoulder area. Sometimes even this Hung Gar form does it too. Perhaps I am over practicing it, or perhaps this is the chi trying to escape? ;)
- Pao Chui is also helpful for energizing, but I just don't have room for it. It barely fits inside the dojo, forget my little condo home.
I pulled something in my leg during the end bit of a 9 hour training in the beginning of the year. I am sure this influenced by sanchin practice, as well as discouraged me from continuing. I know the pain isn't real damage, but I had a bad experience with this earlier. About a year and a half ago I had such severe knee pain that I would wake up at night, several times, almost crying. It was starting to even wake my wife, despite trying to hold it in. Only after some good physio, strengthening, stretching and massage was I able to sleep normally. That was a very draining period, and I didn't want to relapse. I have found that stretching carefully as well as other movements from yoga and calisthenics have helped immensely, but I need to remember to keep up this practice!
Recently I have also started to include some irregular Naifanchin practice into my routine. There is something very Sanchin-like about this variation of Naihanchin that speaks to me. The breathing is similar, and I like the emphasis on non-traditional strikes. Too much of karate focuses now on the usual seiken (forefist) technique, where the original forms had much more variety. Indeed, looking at other Southern Chinese arts shows a great variety of hand forms and unique striking possibilities. I want to start changing my own preference from fist to open-handed variants. On that topic, there is a great article from Ryan Parker at his blog.
Of particular interest to any karateka should be the use of ipponken, nukite and washide uchi techniques. Really interesting information by one who has done the research and practiced what he found. I have never had anyone teach me the boshiken technique, and its not in any form I know or was taught, but I find it very useful for massage! I suspect there is a strong link between correct massage (hitting points to release stress and muscle tension) and hitting soft points to weaken enemies - perhaps a correlation between karate and jujutsu here, where bone setters would also be jujutsu masters. Wishful thinking on my part, but it gives me hope for my own studies. Thumb strikes are great to get into little places like collar bone, armpit, knee pit (?) and arteries like carotid and femoral.
Well, this was a longer post than intended, but I hope something of interest has been exposed to others. At least I have set my own mind straight - more gentle leg tension in Sanchin, more playing with Naihanchi, and look into mental exercises for use in Tensho. I need to get back into a daily routine as well, even if it is more gentle. As I mentioned recently, don't let perfect be the enemy of good. Daily something is better than daily nothing!
21 April, 2013
Amalgamation of martial arts knowledge
Super short post today, referring to a great post by Zacky Chan at his blog. This hits me in a few ways. Well worth reading the post in full there, and I recommend his blog as a whole.
What strikes me is that he has combined disparate areas of study into a way of his own, and continues to do so. This once again makes me wonder what I should be doing next. Is teaching a step I want to take or do I tie on the old white belt and start again in something new...
A friend of mine is a high ranked Aikidoka, so I have been wondering if I should start under him from scratch, or look for something else. I don't want to put any strain on our friendship, but he is looking to build up his own dojo after his return from Japan. I need to learn more about his style before I can commit, I think.
What strikes me is that he has combined disparate areas of study into a way of his own, and continues to do so. This once again makes me wonder what I should be doing next. Is teaching a step I want to take or do I tie on the old white belt and start again in something new...
A friend of mine is a high ranked Aikidoka, so I have been wondering if I should start under him from scratch, or look for something else. I don't want to put any strain on our friendship, but he is looking to build up his own dojo after his return from Japan. I need to learn more about his style before I can commit, I think.
05 March, 2013
Don't let Perfect be the Enemy of Good
Super brief post about another great blogger, who has been a bit missed and whose blog I hold great interest. Joe Berne over at Karate Conditioning has gone through a lot, and I wanted to point out a great little nugget (among many) in his latest post:
Every aspect of training is valuable, and one step is still further than no step at all.
The one nugget that really stood out for me was this:
This is a great quote that encapsulates something I have read by many other martial artists. Don't think that because you can't do X, you shouldn't do X-1, or perhaps Y. This is a common syndrome, one I am equally guilty of. But in the end, one must push through and just do what one can.Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Every aspect of training is valuable, and one step is still further than no step at all.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)